Blessedness: The Beatitudes – Attitude for Blessing

“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.
Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.
Blessed are those who hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled.
Matthew 5:3-6 (NKJV).

As you see, we’ve only listed the first four beatitudes.  That’s because we believe they can be divided into two groups.  In the first four, our Lord describes the attitude required for blessedness.  Indeed, some have called the Beatitudes, “Be-atitudes.”  The second group refers to the activities resulting from the blessings brought by the attitude.

We’ll only look at the first four because of the length of the posts about them.  We’ll look at the other four, Lord willing, in a later post.

Just a couple of things before we get into the study itself.  First, the word translated “blessed” is plural: “makarioi” instead of “makarios,” which is the singular form.  Some have translated it “oh, the blessedness of….”  I think it speaks of abundance, of the lavish blessings God pours out on those our Lord describes in these eight verses.

Second, some translate this “Happy are the….”  One author even titled his book on the Beatitudes, “The Pursuit of Happiness.”  I think this is inadequate, and he himself said that “happy” doesn’t translate the word accurately.  “Happy” is related to words like “hap” – an obsolete word, I grant, but it means “that which comes suddenly or unexpectedly; chance; fortune; accident; casual event.”  (Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary, unabridged, p. 824.)  I don’t think these words are what the Lord had in mind here.  “Happy” depends on our circumstances, our situation, what “happens” around us.  If they go well, we’re “happy,” if they’re not, we’re not.  To the ancient Greeks, the word was used to describe their gods, who were unaffected by the goings on in the mortal world.

The Lord was teaching that true blessedness is not dependent on things outside of ourselves: our wealth, our health, our families, our job, our house, etc.  Indeed, the worldling may have these things, but they are not blessings to him, cf.Luke 16:25.  True blessedness from God comes from things on the inside, which then affect things on the outside.

Having said that, the beatitudes seem to divide themselves into two sections, as we noted above: the first four, which describes attitudes of the heart, and the second four, coming from the first, which describe activities of the hand.

Attitudes of the heart, vs. 3-6

“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”

I think this attitude was supposed to be the result of centuries of the Mosaic Law.  Looking at his nation and himself, the wise Jew would say, “Who can do that?  Who can do those things the Law requires?”  The sacrificial system itself was designed to teach them that, that no one kept the Law perfectly and only through the sacrifice of an innocent substitute were they able to be forgiven of a particular sin and to continue to live.  It was designed to show them their need of a Savior.

“The poor in spirit” literally means “those who are spiritually bankrupt.”  Such know that they have nothing to offer to God, that they are unable to do even one thing He requires perfectly – and imperfectly won’t do.  They’re like the tax-collector in Luke 18:33 who standing afar off [as if he weren’t fit to approach], would not so much as lift his eyes toward heaven, but beat his breast, saying, “God, be merciful to me a sinner!”  I wonder if there isn’t something here in the word translated merciful.  It means “propitious” and was the word (“hilasmos”) used to describe the mercy seat above the Ark of the Covenant in the tabernacle and then in Solomon’s Temple.  The mercy seat was where, once a year on the Day of Atonement, the High Priest would sprinkle the blood of the sacrifice.  The tax-collector wasn’t pleading for mercy because of anything he was or could do, indeed those things brought him under judgment.  He was pleading for mercy on the basis of that sacrifice.

On the other hand, the Pharisee in the story was proud of himself and his accomplishments.  Just listen to him, “God, I thank you that I am not like other men – extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this tax-collector.  [Here I think there was a derisive gesture toward him].  I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all I possess,” Luke 18:11, 12.  Yes, sir, he was something – and not slow to tell you and God all about it.

The Apostle Paul had been like that.  Before his conversion, he himself said that he must do many things contrary to name of Jesus of Nazareth, Acts 26:9.  He had a whole list of things he thought were on the positive side of the ledger, so to speak, 1 Philippians 3:5, 6.

A strange thing happened to him.  Though he doesn’t specifically say when it happened, something happened to him.  In Romans 7:9, he wrote, I was alive once without the law, but when the commandment came, sin revived and I died.

I died.

What does that mean? Certainly, it doesn’t mean physically.  I think it means that he began to understand the comprehensive nature of the Law, that it requires more than just form and ritual and habit; he also began to understand that all those things he thought were good were of no use at all in giving him the righteousness he thought he had.  Like Nicodemus before him, he learned that he needed something he didn’t have and couldn’t produce.  He was bankrupt.  And he was dead, spiritually.

There are many descendants of the Pharisee and Saul today.  Their hope of heaven is based entirely on their belief that they have done something which will get them there.  The list of such things is endless.  They’ve never seen that, like Paul, they have absolutely nothing to commend themselves to God.  They haven’t yet declared spiritual bankruptcy.  And they don’t understand that they are “dead” as far as God is concerned, cf. Ephesians 2:1.

Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.

This is the result of the realization of our sinfulness before a holy and righteous God.  Instead of being so proud of our religious accomplishments, so ready to list them on the credit side of the ledger, we see them for what they are in God’s sight: filthy rags, Isaiah 64:6.  That word translated “filthy rags” refer to a menstrual cloth or to a rag that a leper might use to wipe his sores.  Not a pretty picture, but graphic, demonstrating what “our righteousnesses,” those religious acts, that we’re so proud of, are like in the sight of God.  Our very best, religiously and apart from the Lord Jesus Christ, is as offensive to God as those rags would be to us.  And these are “our righteousnesses.”  When it comes right down to it, we have to admit that we really have very few of those, and a lot more of the other kind.  If our very best is offensive to God, then what must these other acts, the ones which aren’t so “righteous,” be like in His sight?!

Perhaps even more offensive to God is the idea that we CAN do something to get to heaven; that we can work up some sort of righteousness which will get us into the pearly gates, because God has already provided a righteousness, the only righteousness He will accept: the perfect righteousness of the Lord Jesus.  Besides that, there is no other righteousness, period.

Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. 

Meekness.  It is not the same as weakness.  Our Lord referred to Himself as meek and lowly of heart in Matthew 11:29 (KJV).  Other translations say, “gentle and lowly of heart.”  The Lord was anything but weak.  He was humble and gentle, but never “weak.”  Read His scathing denunciations of the Pharisees in Matthew 23, His throwing out of the Temple those who had turned it into a kind of WalMart, John 2:13-17.  The word is the opposite of those who are always demanding their “rights.”  Such people will never understand the saying by one of the Puritans that anything outside of hell is better than we deserve.  Meekness will defend other people’s rights, but isn’t so concerned about securing her own, or about herself.  Meekness isn’t “MEekness.”

What does being “meek” have to do with “inheriting the earth?”

Simply this.  Those who are “meek” are the ones likely to be taken advantage of, cheated, by those are not meek, not selfless.  Our Lord is just assuring such that they will not be the losers in the long run.  After all, this life isn’t all there is to “life.”

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst after righteousness, for they shall be filled. 

This is the other side of being poor in spirit, being hungry for that which we lack and can’t provide for ourselves.  It’s instructive that our Lord uses these figures of speech.  Hunger and thirst are characteristics of life; the dead never hunger and thirst.  That’s why there is so little, or no, desire for the things of God in the world.  Religion, yes; the true God, no.  It is dead in trespasses and sins, Ephesians 2:1. But there are those in whom the Spirit of God operates, which is evident in their hunger and thirst after righteousness.

In the words of the hymn:  “O to be like Thee! blessed Redeemer, This is my constant longing and prayer….”  This is the longing of every true believer: to be more and more like the Savior.  And the Lord promises they will be filled; they will be satisfied.  Not the “foretaste of glory divine” that we have now, but satisfied, full to the brim.  Though true believers are truly saved, they are not yet “entirely sanctified,” as some put it.  John put it like this: Beloved, now we are children of God; and it has not yet been revealed what we shall be [we’re not there, yet], but we know that when He is revealed, we shall be like Him, we shall see Him as He is, 1 John 3:2.  Even so, come, Lord Jesus!

Such are the heart attitudes and characteristics of those who are blessed.  Acutely aware of their spiritual need, mourning over their spiritual faults, failures and shortcomings, yet not selfishly focusing on themselves, hungry and thirsty for that which only the Lord God can provide, yet knowing that one day, if not now, they will be comforted and satisfied beyond this world’s ability of understand or provide.

Such are the blessed.


Be Thou My Vision

Be Thou my Vision. O Lord of my heart –
Nought be all else to me, save that Thou art;
Thou my best thought, by day or by night –
Waking or sleeping, Thy presence my light.

Be Thou my Wisdom, and Thou my true Word –
I ever with Thee and Thou with me, Lord;
Thou my great Father, I thy true son –
Thou in me dwelling, and I with Thee one.

Riches I need not, nor man’s empty praise –
Thou mine inheritance, now and always;
Thou and Thou only, first in my heart –
High King of heaven, my Treasure Thou art.

High King of heaven, my victory won,
May I reach heaven’s joys, O bright heav’n’s Sun!
Heart of my own heart, whatever befall,
Still be my Vision, O Ruler of all.

This 8th century Irish hymn is one of my favorites.

Additional, later edit:

There’s actually another, not so well-known, verse in this popular 1912 rendition by Eleanor Hull.  It would be v. 3, so the vs. 3 and 4 we know become vs. 4 and 5.  Wikipedia has some fascinating information on this hymn.  Here is the additional verse:

Be Thou my breastplate, my sword for the fight.
Be thou my whole armour, be Thou my true might.
Be Thou my soul’s shelter, be Thou my strong tower.
O raise Thou me heavenward, great Power of my power.

A Mother’s Occupation

LOVE this. No woman is ever “just” a mother!

Morning Story and Dilbert

A woman named Emily renewing her driver’s licence at the Transport office was asked by the clerk to state her occupation. She hesitated, uncertain how to classify herself. “What I mean is,” explained the clerk, “do you have a job, or are you just a ……? “Of course I have a job,” snapped Emily. “I’m a Mum.” “We don’t list ‘Mum’ as an occupation…… ‘housewife’ covers it,” said the clerk emphatically.

I forgot all about her story until one day I found myself in the same situation, this time at our local police station. The Clerk was obviously a career woman, poised, efficient, and possessed of a high sounding title like, “Official Interrogator” or “Town Registrar.” “What is your occupation?” she probed. What made me say it, I do not know…

The words simply popped out.”I’m a Research Associate in the field of Child Development and Human Relations.” The clerk…

View original post 325 more words

My Joy, My God, My All

from Habakkuk 3:17-18.

Though the fig tree may not blossom,
Nor fruit be on the vine;
Though the harvest of the olive fail,
And food be hard to find;
Though the flock may come to nothing
And no oxen in the stall –
Yet I’ll rejoice in Yahweh,
My joy, my God, my All.

Oh, What A Happy Soul Am I

Oh, what a happy soul am I
Although I cannot see.
I am resolved that in this world
Contented I will be.
How many blessings I enjoy
That other people don’t!
To weep and sigh because I’m blind,
I cannot, and I won’t!

– Fanny Crosby

This was written when she was eight years old!


How much this little girl teaches us!

The First “Bible Study”

Genesis 3:1-4

It’s interesting to me that the first “Bible study” in Scripture was initiated by Satan.  Granted, Adam and Eve didn’t have “Scripture” as we understand it, but they still had words God had given them – and I don’t suppose that we have a complete record of everything that was said.

Anyway, the tactics Satan used were so successful, as he thought, that he’s used them ever since in his attacks against the Word of God.

1.  Doubt.

“has God said,….”? (NKJV)  The NASB has it, “Indeed, has God said,…?”

So, we hear:

“The Bible was written long after the events it supposedly tells about.”
“The Bible was just written by a bunch of priests to oppress the people.”
“Jesus never existed.”
“A God of love would never do that.”
“That’s just Paul’s Rabbinic prejudice showing through.”
“Paul took the teachings of Jesus and turned them into something Jesus never intended.”
Etc., etc.

We might ask a question ourselves.  Why DID God give the restriction against the one tree?  There are several reasons.  The main one, I think, was to remind Adam, though he was, in effect, lord of all he surveyed, was to remind him that he was still just a creature, and as such, was to obey his Creator.  This was a very simple restriction, nevertheless.  Some will say that the most important reason was so that Adam could have a choice.  That is also true.  Adam and Eve were the only human beings who ever truly had anything approaching “free will.”  They knew nothing of evil.  They had no sin in themselves, and their wills hadn’t yet been corrupted by the Fall.  If anything, they were disposed toward good, that being all they knew.  Still, God didn’t create robots or puppets.  The final reason for the prohibition was what happened whey they did eat of that tree.

2.  Distortion.

Satan presented God command negatively:  …you shall not eat of every tree of the garden?  That’s not at all what God said.  In 1:29, He said to them, “See, I have given you every herb that yields seed which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree whose fruit yields seed; for you it shall be for food.”  In 2:16, 17, we have more of the conversation, “Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat; for in the day you eat of it you shall surely die.” 

Adam and Eve were given a whole world as their pantry.  Everything was theirs for the enjoying, except one lone tree.  But Satan focused on that one tree, as if that prohibition were the whole conversation.

So, today, people have the idea of Christianity that it’s all about giving up fun and good times.  It’s all dreary church services and long faces.  As one man told me, “God forbids all the things we want to do.”

The Scripture says that God gives us all things richly to enjoy, 1 Timothy 6:17.  The Christian has found that to be so, and that all the things the world enjoys, those “good times”, just last for a while, cf. Hebrews 11:25.  When they are over, they leave in their place only heartache, headache, and life-ache, to say nothing of their eternal consequences.

3.  Deviation – although this was Eve.

She added “touching” to God’s command.  Here was the first legalism – the first “list” of “don’t”.  Some have suggested that this was Adam’s idea.  Who knows?  Perhaps it was just to “protect” God’s Word, to make it less likely to disobey.  Still, it was presumption, as if the Word itself weren’t enough.

4.  Denied.

“You shall not die,…”  A blatant denial of God’s plain statement.

But you can’t just deny God’s Word; you put something in its place, which leads us to

5.  Dismissed.

Satan gave a totally different meaning and message that what God had given.  He said that not only would they not die, but that they would become godlike themselves.  The idea is implicit that they wouldn’t need God, they could decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong, what is good or evil.

He neglected to mention that they would become powerless to do good, at least as God defines it, and programmed, as it were, to do only evil – again, as God defines it.

Mankind today, even though it may deny any such being as a devil, has certainly bought into his lie.  Pornography, abortion, marriage equality, immorality of all kinds, violence, bloodshed, the list could go on and on.  Greed and injustice in business.  Political malfeasance on all levels.  Deceit, false advertising – “this product will make you look young and beautiful.”  Why don’t such advertisers use models who aren’t already “young and beautiful”?  Youngsters killing each other.  On and on.  The Bible has pretty much been thrown out, and the devil’s lie put into its place.  With pretty much the same result as the first time it happened.


as much as man denies it,

The wages of sin is death, Romans 3:23.