There are a couple of verses of Scripture that unbelievers and skeptics accept, and are quite insistent should be followed. One, Exodus 20:13 (KJV), is in the title of this post: Thou shalt not kill (KJV). The other one is found in Matthew 7:1: Judge not….
They don’t seem to mind adultery or dishonesty or using the name of God as a swear word, but the sixth commandment must be followed.
Never mind what they say about the rest of Scripture – these verses must be followed. There may be other verses they “like,” but I think these are the two main ones.
So, when some killer is to be put to death for crimes he has committed, or when the execution is botched, as has happened recently, these folks get all worked up and say, “Oh, the poor man! How can such things be done?”
It would be nice if they could show such concern for the victims of this “poor man.”
I certainly don’t advocate “suffering” in execution, but there are a couple of things to keep in mind about the sixth commandment.
First, the Hebrew word translated “kill” comes from a root meaning “to dash in pieces,” and refers primarily to murder or manslaughter. That’s how newer translations put it. “Thou shalt not murder.”
Second, there are over forty “death-penalty” sins in the Old Testament.
These sins include such things as idolatry, spiritism, hitting or continual rebellion against a parent, kidnapping, false witness in a death-penalty case.
The criminals and their lawyers didn’t run things, like they do today. Careful examination was indeed to be made as to the truthfulness of the charges against a person. And two or three witnesses were required for an execution. One only wasn’t enough. And there was a recognition of what we call “technicalities,” only back then it was called “degrees of bloodguiltiness.” These were used to determine the level of punishment, not as reasons for the offender to go free.
Some people can’t understand how the two ideas of “not killing” and the death penalty could coexist like that. It’s simple. Life was valued. Individuals were valued, as being created “in the image of God.” Those who took life forfeited their own. Those who caused harm to others suffered harm themselves.
Some folks argue that we’re not under the Old Testament law. I myself have made that point. The Ten Commandments were given to a people in a certain historical and geographical setting. They were never given to mankind in general; there’s never been a “dispensation of law.”
The Mosaic Covenant, which includes the Ten Commandments were given specifically to the nation of Israel at Sinai. It forms, if you will, her constitution and bylaws. In the situation in which it was given, there are a lot of things which seem very strange to our “modern” thinking. The idea that crime should be punished apparently has become one of them. Our idea that violent criminals should be housed at taxpayer expense and “rehabilitated” would seem very strange to them.
Others argue that Jesus taught that we should love our enemies, so “love” has become the current buzzword. Never mind that what passes for love in our society bears little resemblance to what the Lord Jesus actually taught.
Another favorite incident of opponents of the death-penalty is Jesus “forgiving” the woman taken in adultery in John 8:2-11. We’ve done a post on this, so will just try to summarize here.
This woman had indeed been caught in the very act, v.5. Now Jesus had often set Himself against the Pharisee’s interpretation of the Mosaic Law, so the Pharisees who dragged her into the presence of Jesus wanted to know what He said, it’s emphatic, about this situation, because Moses said that such should be put to death, cf. Leviticus 20:10.
Uttering no word, the Lord simply began to write on the ground. Since Leviticus 20:10 required that both parties be executed, I think He wrote, “Where is the man?” though that’s only supposition on my part because we’re not told what He wrote either time.
After what must have been an embarrassed silence, the men all left and the woman and Jesus were left alone, standing in the midst, v.10. Note very carefully what the Lord asked her and the conversation that followed: “Woman, where are those accusers of yours? Has no one condemned you?” She said, “No one, Lord.” And Jesus said to her, “Neither do I condemn you. Go and sin no more.” vs. 10, 11 (emphases added). Not a word about “forgiveness.” Indeed, the Lord told the men to go ahead and kill her – if they were innocent themselves in this particular matter. I think they had set her up, and were trying to set the Lord up. They failed.
Now, the woman was indeed guilty. However, the Law was very specific about such matters. Though the Pharisees had all testified against her and could have in fact killed her, their own consciences in the face of the holiness of the Lord Jesus prevented them from carrying out the sentence. They, therefore, did not “condemn her.” Because the provisions of the Law were not carried out, neither did the Lord.
The incident has nothing to do with “forgiveness” or “not judging,” as it’s often used.
Regardless of what He might have taught about these things, the Lord Jesus also taught that we were to render…to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, Matthew 22:21. See also Mark 12:17 and Luke 20:25. The fact that three Gospels record this incident show the importance the Lord placed on it.
Paul echoed the Lord when he wrote in Romans 13:1, Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. Among other things, that authority does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil, v.4.
Ideas certainly foreign to modern jurisprudence.
So we have felons walking around free who have murdered or raped or done other violent crimes, but they’ve “served their time,” and so they’re free, while ordinary citizens hide behind locked doors and windows and women are afraid to go out alone at night. How often do we hear of some man whose been arrested for a crime, only to also hear that he’s committed violent crimes before, perhaps several of them.
I’m sorry, but it’s time to rethink this idea of “rehabilitation” for felons who obviously have no interest in being rehabilitated.
It’s often commented by opponents of capital punishment that it doesn’t “deter” crime. That’s only because it takes decades and multiple “appeals” before the sentence is carried out. If criminals were actually executed who deserve it, without all the modern coddling that goes along with it, people might begin to understand that felony is serious.
Besides, if a felon is executed, that certainly “deters” him from committing other crimes.
I know there’s a lot of heat generated by this topic, and this is only part of the discussion about the death penalty, but it’s high time to take our justice system out of the hands of criminals and their lawyers.