Evolution: The Devil’s Gospel

If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do? Psalm 11:3, NKJV.

Though this text may be applied in several ways, I want to use it as a reference to the foundations of our faith as Christians.  If those foundations are destroyed, what happens to our faith?

To destroy the faith has been the aim of the devil since the beginning of human history.  Though we’re given no time frame, I don’t think it took very long in the very beginning of our history in the Garden of Eden before Satan questioned the accuracy and authority of God’s Word.  He came to Adam and Eve and asked, “Has God said…?”

That’s the genius, if I can use that word in this context, of the idea of evolution:  it gets rid of God.  Things just happened, no rhyme, no reason, no purpose, no Garden of Eden and, above all, no God and no devil.  There are no absolutes, except that one, nothing beyond us to tell us what to do, except maybe aliens in the distant past who “seeded” our planet with life and then took off.  Six 24-hour days of creation?  Nonsense.  It took millions and millions of years of evolution from get from a single cell life form, which just happened one day, ..no Maker, no Creator, …just popped up out of the primordial ooze, …to you and me.  No heaven, no hell, no responsibility.

Our culture, our “science,” have fully bought into this lie.  Even many Christians have been taken in by it.  You’ve heard of “the gap theory” in Genesis 1:1, 2, which reads, In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.  And the earth was, or, became, without form and void, or empty.

“Became”.

So the view was put forth that something catastrophic happened after creation, perhaps a pre-Adamite civilization which was judged for some sin, to explain dinosaur fossils and the cavemen and all that, and the earth “became without form and empty.”  This idea puts the alleged millions of years into the “gap” between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2.

The fact that the earth was empty and without form doesn’t mean that it was only a mass of gas or stellar material, as evolution teaches.  It just means that God hadn’t done anything to it yet.  It had no features.  It was “empty.”  The rest of Genesis 1:2 says that the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.”  Then it describes the creation of this planet and the abundant life that is on it – in the course of less than a week, not the ages and ages and ages imagined by atheistic science, which starts off with the assumption that there couldn’t possibly be a God who created it all.

I hesitate to model God’s behavior on our own, as I once heard a radio preacher do who said something to the effect that if we multiplied man a billion times, then we’d have some idea of God.  Not true.  Not true.  If we could somehow magnify man a trillion times, we’d still have just a man.  Now it is true that Genesis 1:26, 27; 2:7 says that God made man in His image.  This doesn’t mean that He made us “little gods,” or anything like that; it means that He made us as rational and moral beings.    That is, we are able to think and reason and learn and do things and make things – we’re not just upscale animals – and we have an innate sense of “right and wrong.”  These may not agree with God’s view, witness the news the last few days, but they are there.

So, when Scripture says that the Spirit was hovering over the waters, does it mean that He was looking things over?  Was He laying out, as it were, where things would go:  Europe here, Asia there, the US over there, and so on?  The names may be modern, but the land masses have been around since the second day of creation, Genesis 1:9, 10.

Evolution gets rid of all that.  There is no God; that’s “the gospel according to evolution.”

That’s the Devil’s gospel.

If evolution is true, and it isn’t, but if it were, then there is no life after death, no hell, no judgment, no eternal torment for the devil and those he deceives.  That would be “good news” indeed for the devil.

But he knows it isn’t true, cf. Matthew 8:29, where we have the account of two demon-possessed men who came into the presence of the Lord Jesus and cried out, “…Have you come here to torment us before the time?

The Devil knows full well where he is going to end up and he wants to take as many folks with him as possible.  So he has produced many false gospels, many false ideas, many distractions, to accomplish just that.

I don’t know of many who deny the fact of death.  (If you have recently experienced such a thing in your family or friends, I’m truly sorry).  The discussion is about what happens afterward.

Is there an “afterward”?

Many deny any such possibility.  We die and that’s it.

Another Devil’s lie.

Scripture says, yes, there is an “afterward,” that …it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment, Hebrews 9:27, emphasis added.

As I’ve written before, death isn’t the end of things; it’s just a change of scenery.  For those who know the Lord Jesus as Lord and Savior, we cannot begin to imagine the joy and happiness of those who enter His presence and heaven.

For those who do not know the Lord Jesus and die without receiving Him as Lord and Savior, we also cannot imagine what they will suddenly discover: eternal judgment and torment, Luke 16:22, 23.

There are many questions about all this.  What about this?  What about that?  What about the other?

The question is, what about you?

What will be your “afterward”?

Nor is there any salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved, Acts 4:12.

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, Acts 16:31.

May God add His blessing, for Jesus’ sake.

“New Testament Christians”

This post was suggested by an article I recently read from Creation Ministries International.  This is a ministry, as its name suggests, that specializes in the defense and explanation of the opening chapters of Genesis as being authoritative, accurate and historical.  I highly recommend it and the publications it produces.  You can contact them at Creation.com.

The article refers to Christians, churches and individuals alike, who, for various reasons, downplay the importance of the Old Testament, and especially the first 11 chapters of Genesis.

Without getting into the article’s approach to the subject, may I suggest some reasons why Genesis is important and should be studied, not neglected.

1. It gives an account of the origin of the earth and its inhabitants that is quite different from the science of our day.  It simply says that in the beginning God created….  Evolutionary science tells us that things just simply happened, without rhyme or reason, and we’re lucky that a planet evolved on which life could form and we could show up.

2. Genesis tells us that it took God six days to create everything and that He “rested” on the seventh day.  Evolution requires numerous billions of years for the development of nothing into everything.  Some try to get around this by saying that Genesis’ “days” are really eons of time.  Genesis describes them as “evening” and “morning.”  If eons of time are really involved, then how did vegetation, which was created on the third day, survive without sunlight, which was created on the fourth day?

3. Genesis tells us that man was a unique and separate creation, not just a development from a lower form of animal.  Nor does it tell us, as some have taught, that God took a couple of hominids with which to form a “special relationship.”  God formed man out of the dust of the earth, not from an ancestor of apes and monkeys.

4. Without Genesis, we have no account of why this world is so messed up, or how, as Paul put it, sin entered.  Genesis tells us that man is a fallen creature, under the judgment of God and driven out from His presence.

5. Genesis gives us the foundation and background of the Gospel.  It contains the very first promise of redemption, when God told Satan, “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed.  He shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise His heel,” Genesis 3:15.

There is a great deal more we could say about this, no doubt.  Simply put, Genesis is the foundation of the rest of the Bible.  Without it, we lose a great deal of what we need to understand it.

We need Genesis.

Having said that, there is another use of the term, “New Testament Christian,” a term very familiar in my own background and history.

Perhaps the majority of professing Christians believe, in one way or another, that we have to live according to the Old Testament, in particular, the Law of Moses.  They try very hard to mold New Testament believers according to an Old Testament pattern.  From this view, for example,  has come infant baptism, because Jewish male babies were circumcised, and, it is said, infant baptism and communion have replaced circumcision and the Passover.  However, circumcision and the Passover weren’t replaced by other symbols, but were fulfilled in that which they symbolized and foreshadowed.  Circumcision is fulfilled in regeneration, and the Passover was fulfilled in the death of Christ.  Baptism, believer’s baptism, the only kind commanded by our Lord and observed in the New Testament, is the believer’s profession of faith, and Communion or the Lord’s Supper, looks back to the death of Christ, not a release from Egyptian bondage.

From the view that we’re obligated to live by the Old Testament has come the idea of a “national church,” in which one is a member simply by virtue of being a citizen of that country.  Spiritual condition has nothing to do with it.  The New Testament knows of no such thing.  Salvation is a personal and individual thing, not a corporate thing.  Nor is it “familial,” that is, the infant has some sort of relationship with God simply because the parent does.  It was to one who perhaps exemplified an Old Testament relationship to God more than any other person in Scripture to whom our Lord said, “You must be born again.”

Though the term “church” is sometimes used in a general sense, its predominant use is in reference to a local group of believers in a given area.  The NT knows nothing of the monolithic religious structures which have risen since the days of the early church.

Along with the idea of a national church has come the idea of a priesthood, based on the OT idea of priesthood, in which the people of God are separated into “clergy” and “laity.”  While it is true that God has given only some men gifts and abilities to be pastors and teachers, every believer may come into the presence of God in prayer for himself and for others.  Such access isn’t limited to a certain “family” or class of believers.  There is no NT office of “priest.”

Well, then, if we’re not to live by the OT Law, does this mean that we can live as we please?

Certainly not.

While there are no instructions for animal sacrifice or any “ritual” in the worship of God, every commandment of the Ten except one is repeated in the New Testament, along with a great deal else unknown to the Old Testament.  The only commandment not repeated in the NT is the one about keeping the seventh day as Sabbath.

There is a great deal more that could be said about this.  It’s a minority viewpoint, to be sure.  Nevertheless, this is what “New Testament Christian” means:  that we live under the teachings of Christ in the New Testament, not under the rules and regulations of Moses in the Old.